Discuss...

Jan. 31st, 2005 04:05 pm
whotheheckami: (Default)
[personal profile] whotheheckami
I'm not sure what my feelings are about this article from the Daily Telegraph


Spotted in [personal profile] j_v_lynch's journal.

Date: 2005-02-01 07:39 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] whotheheckami.livejournal.com
I liek the way your mind works. I'll have to let you organise my defence the next time I need to weasel out of something ;@)

Date: 2005-02-01 01:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] del-c.livejournal.com
All joking aside—this, at root, is exactly and precisely what the Thatcherites are looking for when they propose to cut benefits for people who turn down degrading and underpaid work. They want personal services from an available working class at a cheap rate, and nothing makes them angrier than the thought that someone is getting their tax money to be able turn down a cruddy job until the tight bastards pay a decent wage.

So this is hardly an unexpected consequence of unemployment "reform". It's just a starker picture of "degrading and underpaid" than the usual options.

Date: 2005-02-01 01:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] whotheheckami.livejournal.com
Just to clarify something: "Thatcherites" = Blair and cronies?

Date: 2005-02-01 02:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] del-c.livejournal.com
Thatcherites never went away; actually they didn't spring into existence with Thatcher. And yes, as Blair said (falsely) "we're all Thatcherites now", so he qualifies by self-identification.

Profile

whotheheckami: (Default)
whotheheckami

March 2019

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
1718 1920 212223
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 23rd, 2025 01:00 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios